Official website of the journal Adolescencia e Saude (Adolescence and Health Journal)

Comparison of Fluoride Varnish Versus Silver Diamine Fluoride in Preventing Caries in School-Aged Adolescents

Authors: Hanadi Abdullah Alwafi 1, Abdulrahman Mohammed Madani Dada 2, Abdulaziz Waleed Alhazmi 3, Kadi Saleh Alharbi 3, Malak Mohammed Alwafi 4, Randah Hamza A Al Meaqley Al Blowi 5, Abdulraheem A. Alwafi 6, Fawaz Pullishery 7
1Department of Basic and Preventive Sciences, General Dentistry Program, Batterjee Medical College, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
2Dr. Yousef Mujahid Hakeem Clinic, Al Madinah, Saudi Arabia
3College of Dentistry, Qassim University, Saudi Arabia
4Mouwasat Hospital, Al Madinah, Saudi Arabia
5Nizar Ghulam Clinic, Al Madinah 42312, Saudi Arabia
6Department of Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
7Division of Preventive Dentistry, General Dentistry Program, Batterjee Medical College, Jeddah 21442, Saudi Arabia
Keywords: silver diamine fluoride, fluoride varnish, dental caries prevention, adolescents, randomized controlled trial, preventive dentistry, permanent teeth
Abstract

Background: Dental caries remains a predominant chronic disease among school-aged adolescents worldwide despite advances in preventive dentistry. Fluoride varnish and silver diamine fluoride represent two topical fluoride-based interventions with demonstrated anticaries efficacy; however, direct comparative evidence evaluating their caries-preventive effectiveness in adolescent permanent dentitions remains limited. Objective: This randomized controlled clinical trial aimed to compare the caries-preventive efficacy of 5% sodium fluoride varnish versus 38% silver diamine fluoride applied semiannually over an 18-month period among school-aged adolescents. Methods: A total of 360 adolescents aged 12–15 years with at least one sound first permanent molar at high caries risk were randomly allocated to three groups: fluoride varnish (FV, n = 120), silver diamine fluoride (SDF, n = 120), and placebo control (n = 120). Applications were performed at baseline, 6, and 12 months. Caries assessments using ICDAS-II criteria were conducted at baseline and 18 months by calibrated examiners blinded to group allocation. The primary outcome was new caries incidence on permanent teeth. Results: At 18 months, the mean number of new carious surfaces was significantly lower in the SDF group (0.82 ± 0.94) and FV group (1.24 ± 1.12) compared with the control group (2.47 ± 1.68) (p < 0.001). SDF demonstrated a caries-preventive fraction of 66.8% compared with 49.8% for FV, with the difference between SDF and FV reaching statistical significance (p = 0.003). The proportion of participants remaining caries-free was highest in the SDF group (58.3%) compared with the FV (43.3%) and control (22.5%) groups (p < 0.001). However, tooth staining was significantly more prevalent in the SDF group (72.5%) than in the FV group (3.3%) and the control group (0%) (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Both silver diamine fluoride and fluoride varnish significantly prevented new caries development in adolescents compared with placebo; however, SDF demonstrated superior caries-preventive efficacy. The aesthetic concern of tooth staining associated with SDF use requires careful consideration in adolescent populations.