Comparative Performance of Label-Free HER2 Immunosensors on Bare, Poly(P-Anisidine)-Modified, and Ammonium Alginate-WO3-Modified Glassy Carbon Electrodes

Authors

  • Mohammed N. Alabbasi
  • Amer Th. Al-Taee
  • Luay A. Al-Helaly

Keywords:

HER2-ECD; label-free immunosensor; glassy carbon electrode; poly(p-anisidine); tungsten trioxide; differential pulse voltammetry.

Abstract

The transducer architecture of a label-free electrochemical immunosensor can alter signal transport, calibration shape, and short-term stability, but these effects are not necessarily aligned. This study compared three glassy-carbon platforms for detection of the extracellular domain of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2-ECD): activated bare glassy carbon (GCE), poly(p-anisidine)-modified GCE (GCE/PPA), and GCE/PPA coated with an ammonium alginate-tungsten trioxide nanocomposite [GCE/PPA/(AmAlg-WO3)]. Each platform was combined with trastuzumab (AbT), pertuzumab (AbP), or an equal-mass trastuzumab-pertuzumab mixture (AbTP), producing nine independently calibrated immunosensors. PPA electropolymerization was optimized over 6-15 cyclic-voltammetric cycles; 10 cycles gave the largest charge (72.1 μC). Ferri/ferrocyanide differential-pulse voltammetry was used only to compare electrode architectures. Relative to bare GCE, signal retention decreased to 51.9% after PPA deposition and recovered to 70.7% after AmAlg-WO3 coating. HER2 measurements were then performed without ferri/ferrocyanide by following the decrease in the approximately 0.9 V peak observed after EDC/NHS treatment. Cumulative HER2 additions covered 1.99-195 ng mL−1, and response was defined as ΔI = I0 − IHER2. All configurations followed a baseline-adjusted saturation model, with R2 values of 0.9942-0.9998. Model-derived detection and quantification limits ranged from 0.052 to 0.286 ng mL−1 and from 0.158 to 0.911 ng mL−1, respectively. GCE/AbTP produced the smallest calibration errors (RMSE 0.0697 μA; MAE 0.0593 μA) and the lowest calculated detection limit (0.052 ng mL−1), whereas GCE/PPA/(AmAlg-WO3)/AbTP showed the smallest 45-min drift (0.92%). Thus, the bare mixed-antibody sensor provided the strongest calibration performance, while the nanocomposite mixed-antibody sensor provided the best short-term operational stability. The results show that increased absolute current or interfacial transport does not alone determine analytical quality and that architecture should be selected against the intended performance criterion.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-17

How to Cite

Alabbasi, M. N., Al-Taee, A. T., & Al-Helaly, L. A. (2026). Comparative Performance of Label-Free HER2 Immunosensors on Bare, Poly(P-Anisidine)-Modified, and Ammonium Alginate-WO3-Modified Glassy Carbon Electrodes. Adolescência E Saúde, 21(6s), 2128–2141. Retrieved from https://adolescenciaesaude.com/index.php/aes/article/view/1912

Issue

Section

Original Articles